Bellingham's Midfield Mastery: Breaking Down His Impactful 84 Minutes Against Al-Hilal

Bellingham's Midfield Mastery: Breaking Down His Impactful 84 Minutes Against Al-Hilal

Bellingham’s Quiet Dominance: A Data Story

The 84-Minute Blueprint

When my algorithm flagged Bellingham’s 73 ground duel success rate against Al-Hilal, I nearly spilled my protein shake. For context: that’s better than his season average (5.83.1) despite playing deeper than usual. His 50 touches tell an interesting story - just 12 came in the final third, suggesting Ancelotti deployed him as a progressive pivot rather than pure attacking mid.

Defensive Contributions That Don’t Show Up on ESPN

That solitary interception at 63’? It triggered Madrid’s fastest counter of the match (3.2 seconds to box entry). Our tracking shows his average defensive sprint speed jumped to 8.4 m/s post-interception vs. 6.9 m/s normally. Classic ‘baller math’: when your D becomes O.

The Unseen Battles

  • 3235 passing accuracy (91.4%) under constant pressure from Al-Hilal’s double-pivot
  • Only 9 lost possessions despite 17 direct challenges (per Second Spectrum)
  • Made 2 recoveries within 5 seconds of losing the ball - we call this the ‘Modric Coefficient’

Why Traditional Stats Lie

The “1 key pass” stat undersells his influence. Using our *Chain Involvement Metric*™, Bellingham initiated or progressed 11 of Madrid’s 15 meaningful attacks. Sometimes the assist comes three passes before the assist.

(Data sources: Sofascore, STATS LLC tracking, proprietary algorithms)

WindyCityStatGoat

Likes81.14K Fans3.35K

Hot comment (2)

DatenStratege
DatenStrategeDatenStratege
1 month ago

Bellingham spielt Schach, während andere Mühle spielen

Als Datenfreak musste ich lachen, als ich seine 73 Bodenduell-Statistik sah. Der Junge spielt so tief wie der Tegernsee und trotzdem effizienter als sein Saisonschnitt!

Modric-Koeffizient? Mehr wie Bellingham-Update! Diese 2 Balleroberungen innerhalb von 5 Sekunden – da bekommt selbst Kroos neidische Blicke. Und diese ‘1 Schlüsselpass’-Statistik? Lächerlich! Unser Algorithmus zählt 11 Angriffsbeteiligungen.

Fazit: Wenn deine Verteidigung besser angreift als andere Stürmer, hast du entweder Bellingham auf dem Platz… oder ein Datenproblem. Was meint ihr?

618
15
0
HoopAlchemist
HoopAlchemistHoopAlchemist
1 month ago

When Math Meets Magic

Bellingham’s 84-minute masterclass against Al-Hilal wasn’t just football—it was a Python script come to life. My algorithms spat out his 73 ground duel ratio, and I swear my laptop did a backflip.

The Modric Coefficient Strikes Again

That ‘1 key pass’ stat is lying harder than a politician. Chain Involvement Metric™ says he orchestrated 1115 attacks. Somewhere, Xavi is nodding respectfully into his spreadsheet.

Hot take: If Bellingham keeps this up, we’ll need a new stat—‘Midfield Sorcery Per 90’. Debate me.

163
63
0